ACADEMIC JOURNAL
|
ISSN 2542-1077 (Print) ISSN 1994-5973 (Online) |
To the 350th anniversary of the birth of Peter the Great |
Gargyants M. G. | European University at St. PetersburgSaint Petersburg Institute of History of Russian Academy of Sciences; |
Keywords: cultural memory in the USSR Tolstoy’s play “On the Rack” the Soviet myth of Peter the Great the Sovietization of Peter the Great Marxist historiography literary debates soviet propaganda |
Summary: The purpose of this article is to determine the range of contradictions that emerged during the discussion
of the image of Peter the Great in the 1920s in the sphere of literary scholars. For this purpose it was necessary to
perform the following tasks: to show the main literary trends of Tolstoy’s play “On the Rack” and to compare them with the ideological and political views of the intelligentsia of the late 1920s, as reflected in reviews of the play’s production. The analysis of the “Petrovsky myth” at the initial stage of its emergence is urgent for today as it allows us to consider
the already realized model of constructing a heroic image of one of the national rulers. It also helps us to understand
how history can be gradually instrumentalized for the purposes of agitation and propaganda. As F. B. Schenk’s famous
research on the image of Alexander Nevsky has shown, the images of national heroes from the past in a modified form
remain in the cultural memory of modern Russia as well. The figure of Peter the Great has always occupied a special
place in this respect because, starting from the historiography of the 19th century, it has always been related with both
negative and pathetic associations. The article demonstrates that this contradiction influenced the discussions about the
“Petrovsky myth” in the late 1920s. It concludes that the views of representatives of the literary community on Peter the
Great were predetermined, firstly, by the primacy of historiographical evaluations of M. N. Pokrovsky school, secondly, by the desire to avoid the conclusions of bourgeois historiography of the late 19th century, and thirdly, by fears of an overt analogy between the overkill of Petrine reforms and the first years of Bolshevik power formation. |
Displays: 706; Downloads: 4; |