ACADEMIC JOURNAL
|
ISSN 2542-1077 (Print) ISSN 1994-5973 (Online) |
Ethnology, anthropology and ethnography |
Zaytsev O. A. | Barents Centre of the Humanities – the Branch of the Federal Research Centre “Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences” |
Keywords: Kola Sami Soviet ethnography beliefs religion evolutionism anthropology of religion |
Summary: The paper deals with the problem of interpreting ethnographic facts and factors influencing such interpretation. The study is necessary due to the relevance of the debated issues of modern anthropology related, firstly, to the language ofthe description of what is commonly called “religious beliefs”, “religious notions”, and “religion” and, secondly, to the
methods of field ethnography that studies this subject. These questions had already existed at the stage of the Russian
and Soviet ethnography formation. The aim of the study was to identify common and specific features in the descriptions
and interpretations of the religious ideas of the Kola Sami in the texts of researchers who lived during the same
time period and belonged to the same social group. The works of Soviet ethnographers V. V. Charnoluskiy and N. N.
Volkov written during the 1930s were studied. Ethnographic research was influenced not only by external historical
and political factors but also by socialization within L. Ya. Sternberg and V. G. Bogoraz’s school of thought, as well as
the diversity of views and academic open-mindedness of the leading scholars, biographical trajectories, circumstances
of field research, the ideological factor, political convictions of researchers, and the level of professionalism, which
enabled to use the possibilities of the evolutionary paradigm. The article for the first times compares the Soviet ethnographers’
views on the religious ideas of the Kola Sami. The comparison of the works of two researchers leads to the
conclusion that they interpreted the same ethnographic subjects and religious representations of the Kola Sami in their
own way, despite working in the same field with similar subjects, plots, and materials. A multi-factor approach and the interpretative analysis of texts enable us to overcome the stereotypical assessments of the Soviet ethnographers’ works. |
Displays: 512; |