
ACADEMIC JOURNAL
|
ISSN 2542-1077 (Print) ISSN 1994-5973 (Online) |
Theoretical, Applied and Comparative Linguistics |
| Vered V. T. | Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba |
|
Keywords: impersonality linguistic worldview functional grammar semantics pragmatics comparative linguistics |
Summary: The article explores the intralingual and interlingual (translingual) communicative potential of Russian
impersonal constructions. The relevance of the topic is conditioned by the following: a large portion of cognitive
research in the field focuses on lexical meaning and semantic relations between words, with little research done to
evaluate grammatical phenomena as a means of reflecting the worldview. The article focuses on the functional and
semantic features of the category of impersonality in the Russian language. Russian impersonal sentences are com-
pared and contrasted with their English equivalents (selected from Ivan Turgenev’s works translated from Russian by
Constance Garnett and included into the book Dream Tales and Prose Poems). A hypothesis is formulated and proved
that the communicative core of impersonality is formed by impersonal constructions in which a predicate is expressed
by personal verbs in an impersonal form or impersonal reflexive verbs with the postfix -sya corresponding to similar
active verbs without postfixes. The presence of such structures indicates the communicative needs to conceal the sub-
ject of the action and describe the situation as arbitrary, self-developing, and dominating the subject, in which the latter
is not directly involved and acts exclusively as a recipient. Being translated into English, most Russian impersonal
constructions are replaced by English constructions with personal verbs, which leads to a reduction of meaning, and
the semantics of impersonality may only be partially recreated by lexical means. A conclusion is drawn that Russian impersonal constructions play a major role in the conceptualization of reality and the creation of cultural codes that are most significant for native speakers at the given point of historical development. |
|
Displays: 41; |