ACADEMIC JOURNAL
|
ISSN 2542-1077 (Print) ISSN 1994-5973 (Online) |
Russian language. Languages of the peoples of Russia |
Rozhkova A. V. | Petrozavodsk State University |
Keywords: Feofan Prokopovich syntax substantive combinations rhetorical figures diachronic rhetoric |
Summary: The relevance of this study arises from the limited exploration of the syntactic structure in the works of
Feophan Prokopovich. The focus of this research is on 318 substantive combinations drawn from five of the author's
oratorical pieces. The objective is to analyze the structure of these combinations, provide a lexico-semantic
characterization of their components, and identify their rhetorical functions. The research employs various methods,
including survey analysis, classification, and stylistic analysis. The findings reveal that constructions featuring
definitions paired with either dependent or main nouns are the most prevalent. In the majority of cases, a direct order of
main and dependent nouns is observed. Definitions that accompany dependent nouns appear in both pre-position and
post-position roughly equally, whereas those associated with main nouns predominantly occupy the pre-position. While
the analysis identifies core models responsible for a significant number of constructions, there remains a substantial
variety of patterns with flexible arrangements and differing numbers of components. The ways in which nouns and
adjective definitions are expressed, along with their structural organization, suggest that these combinations serve as
valuable rhetorical resources. Techniques such as inversion, chiasmus, metaphor, synonymous series, amplification,
and repetition align with the text’s content and contribute to the oratorical objectives, such as honoring the monarch, his
heirs, the state, and its warriors and victories. Furthermore, the figurative nature of many combinations is linked to the Church Slavonic tradition. The results of this study are significant for future investigations into substantive combinations within the history of the Russian literary language and for the exploration of the stylistic uniqueness of Feofan Prokopovich’s works. |
Displays: 170; |