Patroeva, N. V. THE IMPORTANCE OF YA. I. GIN’S WORK FOR THE STUDY OF THE POETIC SYNTAX // Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University. 2018. No 4 (173). DOI: 10.15393/uchz.art.2018.157


Linguistics


THE IMPORTANCE OF YA. I. GIN’S WORK FOR THE STUDY OF THE POETIC SYNTAX

Patroeva
N. V.
Petrozavodsk State University
Keywords:
Ya. I. Gin
poetics of grammatical categories
poetic syntax
poetic grammar
syntax of a literary text
Summary: The article shows the main problems of the poetics of the grammatical categories within the framework of the concept developed by Ya. I. Gin, a vivid representative of Petrozavodsk school of researchers of the poetic grammar. Creative legacy of Ya. I. Gin is shown in the aspect of the relevance of his academic ideas for the fruitful development of the actual for modern philology studies in the field of the poetic syntax and grammar of the poetic text. Although, the questions of the poetics of the morphological categories (genus, animate / inanimate) took the main place in the research of Ya. I. Gin, but the method, developed by the scholar, for analyzing lyrical communication from the viewpoint of changing faces and the addressee’s problems, dialogical contexts, case forms makes it possible to extrapolate this methodology into the field of poetic syntax with the aim of studying the structure, semantics and functional potential of syntactic constructions. The author of the article thinks that it’s a very fruitful idea of Ya. I. Gin to include into the subject of the poetic syntax both functional (following I. I. Kovtunova) and formal aspects of the study of the syntactic level of the lyric text in their inter-influence and interaction: a certain type of the construction not only participates in the formation of the architectonics, structure, grammatical semantics and the general content of the text, in the creation of techniques of semantic emphasis, “foregrounding” (tropes and speech figures), but is also closely related to the meter, stanza and genre of the poetic works, as is confirmed by the data of the recently published “Syntactic Dictionary of Russian Poetry”.




Displays: 318;